百度翻译“我妈家暴我！”11岁男孩到派出所报警，结局笑翻全网……_我的网站
一 |
二 | ”
“我妈‘家暴’我!”
近日，辽宁省大连市公安局
西岗分局白云派出所
走进一对母子
一进门便径直“吵”到民警面前
小男孩一开口就满脸委屈：
“她‘家暴’，我没写作业”
民警当即耐心询问：
“那你妈妈打你了吗?”
“打了!”
对此，妈妈康女士也没回避
“我们约好明天带他出去玩2天
他也答应了提前把作业完成
免得带出门
结果迟迟不动笔
我气急之下打了他两下”
康女士说
可紧接着
男孩又认真地补充了一句
“她用iPad拍(监督)我
我让她关了
她不关，她侵犯我肖像权”
几句话
把在场民警听得哭笑不得  The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post. It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported. So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative. The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect. "I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post. Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported. This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge. Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said. The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine. Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation. Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge. Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said. 。 Current article:http://06xcywk.shuosongzoutunchutao.cfd/1mv1/20260826/16054.html Published on:09:28:53 |
原来
这场闹到派出所的“家庭纠纷”
根源在于写暑假作业
假期里
11岁的儿子写作业拖拖拉拉
康女士反复催促
孩子却被越催越烦
母子二人你一句、我一句
各执一词，互不退让
便来到家门口的派出所“断官司”
听完母子俩的对话
民警王超也弄清了症结所在：
“男孩因为一下要多做2天作业
心里打怵拖沓
妈妈因为同时还要照顾老人
和2岁半的小女儿
沟通过程也有些急躁”
看着还在赌气闹别扭的孩子
康女士无奈又好笑
由于心中还牵挂在家的老人和小女儿
她索性当场把作业本拿了出来
“要不你在这里写吧，有警察叔叔看着”
她又问民警
“把孩子留这写作业
我先离开行不行?”
“行!”
眼看俩人还都在情绪点上
民警王超便答应下来
正好也让两人分开平复情绪
就这样
刚刚还执意“报警”的11岁男孩
在派出所开启了
专属“托管写作业”模式
康女士走后
民警王超便开始给男孩做思想工作：
“妈妈需要去照顾姥姥姥爷
即使不能帮助爸爸妈妈
分担其他事情
自己的事情是不是也要独立完成?”
“妈妈动手也不对
但是咱们可以跟妈妈证明
作业做完了，我跟你妈妈说”
听了警察叔叔的耐心开导
男孩的情绪渐渐平复了下来
主动打开作业本开始写作业
随后，从外面办事回来的
派出所案件中队副中队长孙鑫阳
也来到男孩身边驻足
陪伴他一起看题、写作业
遇到孩子不会的题
就一点点细心讲解、耐心答疑
孙鑫阳说
“一开始发现语文作业有个错别字
后来从语文作业
辅导到了英语作业
男孩很聪明，一点就通”
派出所里
一边是民辅警忙着手头的工作
一边是“小孩哥”埋头写着作业
在民辅警轮番的情绪疏导
暖心陪伴与课业辅导下
男孩彻底沉下心来
顺利完成了与妈妈的约定
提前做完了未来2天的作业
随后
民警及时联系了康女士
反馈了孩子在所内的良好表现
同时也劝导康女士
与孩子沟通时注意方式方法
“警察同志真的太暖心了!
他们不仅要维持公共治安
还要管我们这些家长里短，很辛苦!”
康女士说
“我以后也要控制自己情绪
跟孩子好好沟通
少给警察同志添麻烦!”
一场因为作业引发的母子“大战”
就这样慢慢消解了
这场趣味满满的
派出所临时“作业托管”小故事
圆满落幕
这暖心的一幕在网络走红后
不少网友留言点赞：
“民警人真好，处理事情又耐心又负责”
“既有学识又懂共情，让人舒服”
还有网友打趣道：
“我现在报警行不行
让警察叔叔盯着我家孩子写作业图片”
“处理邻里纠纷、家庭矛盾
是我们基层派出所每天工作的日常
我们要用细致、耐心的工作
守护好每个小家的幸福”
民警孙鑫阳说
温馨提示：
派出所从来不是“作业托管班”
面对赌气的孩子、焦虑的家长
却用温柔化解了一场争执
有时候，化解生活里的“小矛盾”
恰是需要这样的细致与耐心
来源：人民日报微信(记者：胡婧怡)，部分素材来源：平安大连。